JMIR Formative Research

Introduction: Nicotine Pouches are increasingly used as a smokeless alternative to cigarettes and other nicotine products, yet their acute cardiovascular effects remain poorly documented. While nicotine's impact on heart rate and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters is well-documented in smoking, no trials have evaluated these effects specifically for nicotine pouches. Methods: This study is a single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial which will include 20 healthy adult nicotine users. Participants will undergo three sessions, receiving either a placebo, 6 mg, or 14 mg nicotine pouch in random order. Heart rate obtained by an ECG and various other ECG parameters, vital signs, and subjective symptoms will be measured at baseline, and multiple time points over 30 minutes. Conclusions: This study aims to determine whether nicotine pouches cause acute changes in heart rate, ECG parameters, vital signs, and self-reported symptoms. We hypothesize that higher nicotine pouch does will lead to measurable increases in heart rate and other autonomic effects compared to placebo.

Objectives This study aimed to assess sleep patterns and life satisfaction among employees of a private company in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, and to examine the relationships among sleep quality, life satisfaction, and selected demographic variables. A quantitative descriptive cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Methods A convenience sample of 110 male employees participated in the study. Data were collected using the Sleep Disorder Assessment Scale (16 items; Cronbachs = 0.89) and the Life Satisfaction Scale (5 items). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 29, including descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and Pearson correlation analysis. Results Most participants (66.4%) were aged 20-30 years, and 82.7% experienced moderate sleep-related problems. Mobile phone use before bedtime was common, with 60.9% reporting occasional use and 35.5% reporting regular use. Overall, 41.8% reported neutral life satisfaction, while 25.5% and 24.6% were slightly and extremely satisfied, respectively. A significant negative correlation was found between poor sleep patterns and life satisfaction (r = -0.389, p < 0.001). Mobile phone use before bedtime and shift work were significantly associated with sleep patterns (p = 0.048). Conclusion Poor sleep quality, particularly among shift workers and frequent bedtime mobile phone users, is associated with lower life satisfaction. Workplace interventions promoting sleep hygiene may enhance employee well-being.

Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of Post-Exertional Malaise (PEM) among adults with prior COVID-19 and associated mental health and disability outcomes. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data from a survey of 9,620 adults with prior COVID-19 in New York City, collected May - June 2024. PEM was measured with the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire - Post Exertional Malaise, categorized by symptom duration (< 14 vs. [&ge;]14 hours). Weighted prevalence estimates were stratified by socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess the association of PEM with depression, anxiety, and disability. Results: The prevalence of PEM symptoms was 20.9% overall and 4.0% with symptom duration [&ge;]14 hours, representing over 800,000 New Yorkers affected and over 150,000 who meet a diagnostic criterion for ME/CFS. PEM prevalence was higher among women, transgender and non-binary adults, people of color, and lower educational attainment, chronic comorbidities, or disabilities. PEM was associated with 3 - 4 times higher prevalence of mental health outcomes and 4 - 5 times higher disability scores. Conclusions: PEM symptoms were common and strongly associated with disability and adverse mental health. Screening, pathways to care, and supportive policies are needed to mitigate long-term consequences, particularly among marginalized populations.

Introduction: Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS), formerly known as polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is a common endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. Besides reproductive and metabolic disturbances, PMOS negatively impacts psychological well-being and quality of life. Despite available treatment options, there remains a need for safe and effective therapies that improve both clinical symptoms and fertility outcomes. Aim: To compare the efficacy of VAMHA and MYRHA tablet combination therapy with standard non-hormonal therapy in restoring regular menstruation. Secondary objectives included assessment of ovulation, menstrual symptoms, polycystic ovarian morphology, hormonal and metabolic parameters, anthropometric measures, and skin manifestations. Study Design: Open-label, randomized, multicentre, prospective comparative clinical study. Methods: Seventy-one women with PMOS were randomized to Group A (n=37) or Group B (n=34). Group A received VAMHA and MYRHA tablets (2 tablets each), while Group B received Metformin 500 mg plus Myoinositol 600 mg (1 tablet), twice daily for 180 days. Data were recorded in Case Report Forms. Statistical Analysis: Continuous variables were summarized using mean and standard deviation, while categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Appropriate statistical tests, including Chi-square, were used. A p-value [&le;]0.05 was considered significant. Results: Significantly more participants in Group A achieved regular menstrual cycles than Group B (31 vs. 22; p<0.05). Ovulation occurred in 16 participants in Group A compared with 6 in Group B (p<0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in menstrual irregularity and related symptoms. Significant reductions in Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH), fasting insulin, and body mass index (BMI) were observed in both groups (p<0.05). Resolution of polycystic ovarian morphology occurred in 13 participants (38.23%) in Group A and 10 (33.33%) in Group B. Both treatments were well tolerated with no major safety concerns. Conclusions: VAMHA and MYRHA combination therapy was superior to standard non-hormonal therapy in improving menstrual regularity and ovulation. It also produced favourable metabolic, hormonal, and ultrasonographic outcomes, suggesting its potential as a safe and effective option for comprehensive PMOS management and fertility enhancement.

Background. A primary constraint on the capacity of EMS programs to meet industry demand is psychomotor instruction and verification, requiring direct observation of each student by a qualified evaluator. Whether AI video analysis can relieve it is untested; none has been applied to EMS skill examination or compared with human examiners. Objective. To quantify human EMS evaluator inter-rater reliability and evaluate an AI video-analysis platform against it. Methods. In a prospective, fully crossed study, five certified EMS evaluators and an AI platform independently scored identical video-recorded EMT performances of cervical collar application (n=15), bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation (n=14), and medical assessment (n=15) on dichotomous checklists with critical-failure criteria. Agreement was assessed at item, score, and decision levels using Fleiss' kappa, Krippendorff's alpha, Gwet's AC1, and ICC(2,1)/ICC(2,k). Results. Human item agreement was moderate (kappa 0.409 to 0.467), as was single-rater reliability (ICC(2,1) 0.539 to 0.694), against good panel reliability (ICC(2,k) 0.854 to 0.919). Recorded pass/fail agreement was fair (kappa 0.297 to 0.388) and critical-failure agreement near zero for two skills (kappa 0.028, 0.119). AI alignment tracked rubric observability rather than task complexity: r = 0.857 (collar, exceeding every human), -0.173 (BVM), 0.664 (medical), and it was most lenient on two skills. Conclusions. Human evaluators are an imperfect standard, especially on critical failures. The AI was a legitimate additional rater where checklist items were discrete and visually verifiable, but not where credit required judging continuous quantities such as ventilation rate, volume, or suction duration. Defensible uses are formative and archival, not summative. These results reflect an early, non-specialist configuration: a baseline, not a limit.

Background: Fluctuations in pain intensity are intrinsic to non-specific chronic low back pain (nsCLBP). Nevertheless, pain fluctuations have rarely been considered when investigating pathophysiological mechanisms. Therefore, a novel study protocol was developed and implemented to systematically assess the impact of fluctuating pain states on pain-related measures. Methods: The final study cohort consisted of 45 nsCLBP patients and 47 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs). Patients participated in three visits, conducted during different pain states (i.e. clinically relevant pain, low-intensity clinical pain / pain-free, clinically irrelevant pain induced using a Qutenza 8% capsaicin patch). Pain fluctuations were monitored through online assessments every four days and guided the pseudorandomized visit scheduling. HCs participated in a single visit. Each study visit comprised a multimodal battery of pain-related measures. Results: 93.33% of patients completed all three visit types in a pseudorandomized order (chi-squared=1.50, p=0.826). Visit scheduling was possible due to the high self-report adherence (median=93.48%), unrelated to self-report burden (rho=-0.097, p=0.53). Study visits were conducted during different pain states, as indicated by: i) the significantly higher low back pain intensity in the clinically relevant pain visit (mean[SD]: 3.98[0.90]), compared to the low-intensity clinical pain (1.03[0.86]) and clinically irrelevant pain (1.13[0.82]) visits (p-values<0.001), as well as by ii) the successful induction of a moderate-to-high clinically irrelevant pain across assessments. Conclusion: Despite scheduling complexity and pain state transition uncertainty, a pain state-dependent pseudorandomized study design is feasible and could improve the understanding of nsCLBP mechanisms.

Introduction Hearing loss (HL) affects over 1{middle dot}5 billion people globally and India shares a disproportionately high burden including Disabling Hearing Loss (DHL). HL affects an Individual socio-economically, but there are limited studies on the broader societal economic consequences of HL in India.Methods Using Cost-of-Illness (COI) approach, we studied the societal economic burden of HL in India. This study uses epidemiological and macroeconomic data and modelling to estimate the loss of Gross National Income (GNI) due to HL and DHL across three economic pathways. Uncertainty is evaluated using deterministic and Probabilistic Sensitivity Analyses (PSA).Results The model estimates that there are in India, 289 million and 85{middle dot}9 million people with HL and DHL respectively. Direct Loss of GNI and Indirect Loss of GNI (Caregiver burden) are estimated as INR 4,648{middle dot}4 billion (USD 55{middle dot}6 billion) and INR 3,268 billion (USD 39 billion) respectively. The Loss of GNI due to Low Education amongst those with HL is estimated as INR 1,041{middle dot}9 billion (USD 12{middle dot}45 billion).Discussion Economic burden of HL is presented across three pathways with Direct Loss of GNI due to DHL being the greatest. It also presents age stratified caregiver economic burden. The findings of the study help in estimating similar cost pathways, advocacy, and policy decisions towards reducing HL prevalence in India and LMICs. This study also highlights the need for India specific estimations related to the HL attributable low education, state-wise disaggregates, and prevalence studies. Funding This study has not received any funding.

Health facilities (HFs) routinely administer medicines and are expected to ensure patient safety by detecting, reporting, investigating, and analysing adverse events following exposure to drugs (AEFED). This study aimed to assess the implementation of pharmacovigilance activities in referral and regional health facilities in Cameroon and to identify pharmacovigilance training needs among healthcare personnel (HP). This was a cross-sectional descriptive study targeting referral and regional health facilities and healthcare personnel involved in patient care and pharmacovigilance activities in Cameroon. Health facilities were selected using stratified purposive sampling, while healthcare personnel were selected through exhaustive sampling. Data were collected using semi-structured electronic questionnaires administered face-to-face by trained enumerators. The questionnaires assessed the organization, resources, and implementation of pharmacovigilance activities at health facilities, as well as healthcare personnel knowledge of pharmacovigilance concepts, previous training, and perceived training needs. Of the 14 eligible health facilities, 10 (71.4%) consented to participate in the study. Of the 10 health facilities, 4 (40.0%) had an established pharmacovigilance unit, while 3 (30.0%) reported conducting neither detection nor notification activities. Among the 261 healthcare personnel approached, 214 (81.9%) participated. Only 41.6% had needed knowledge to detect an adverse event, while 72.9% were aware of adverse event notification procedures. Previous exposure to pharmacovigilance training was reported by 37.9% of healthcare personnel, and all participants expressed a need for additional training, particularly on national pharmacovigilance regulations (69.2%), organization of the pharmacovigilance system (67.3%), and adverse event detection (67.3%). The main reported challenges by healthcare personnel in the implementation of pharmacovigilance activities included insufficient budget allocation, limited access to pharmacovigilance training, lack of pharmacovigilance guidelines and insufficient qualified human resources. Pharmacovigilance implementation in referral and regional health facilities in Cameroon remains limited, with gaps in organizational structures, resources, healthcare personnel knowledge, and training. Strengthening pharmacovigilance systems through improved facility capacity, availability of essential tools, and targeted healthcare personnel training is needed to enhance drug safety surveillance.

BACKGROUND Generative AI (genAI) chart summarization tools embedded in electronic health records (EHRs) are being rapidly deployed across U.S. health systems. Although these tools represent a promising solution to alleviate cognitive burdens, their effects have not been examined in randomized-clinical trials (RCTs). METHODS In this pragmatic RCT at a single academic health system, 284 outpatient clinicians across forty-two specialties were assigned 1:1 to Epic's outpatient chart summarization tool or a usual-care control arm over 90 days, from February 23 to May 23, 2026. The primary outcome was physician task load (PTL) adapted for pre-charting. Prespecified exploratory outcomes included additional validated psychometrics as well as usability, safety, and time-based measures. Descriptive statistics included interaction and usage of the tool. RESULTS Of 74,474 AI chart summaries generated, 14.2% were interacted with by a clinician; the proportion of generated summaries interacted with declined from 21.5% in month 1 to 10.5% in month 3, and the proportion of clinicians using the tool at least once per month declined from 88.7% to 66.2%. The adjusted between-arm difference in PTL at follow-up favored the intervention arm (scale 0-400; -27.4; 95% CI, -49.4 to -5.3; P=0.02). Among the Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI; scale 0-4, lower=better) psychometrics, overall burnout (-0.20; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.01) and work exhaustion (-0.24; 95% CI, -0.47 to -0.02) were lower in the intervention arm, with little difference in overall professional fulfillment (+0.04; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.25). Charting time per encounter showed no significant between-arm difference during steady state (-1.2 seconds; 95% CI, -19.0 to 16.6). The net promoter score was -22, indicating that on average, clinicians did not recommend the tool. Among free-text respondents, 57.1% reported at least one concern, most commonly tool limitations or inaccurate information. No adverse patient safety events or near-misses were reported. CONCLUSION An EHR-integrated AI chart summarization tool modestly reduced physician task load and was associated with lower burnout, without time savings and against declining engagement. Sustained usage and oversight of reported inaccuracies remain open challenges.

Introduction: Risk of recurrent opioid use during buprenorphine-naloxone (bup-nx) treatment is dynamic and remains elevated after initiation, with vulnerability shaped in part by treatment intensity and gaps between visits, yet routine outpatient care relies on episodic encounters and retrospective data. This mismatch can delay recognition of emerging instability and limit timely treatment adjustments. This paper reports the development and specification of an intervention strategy to address this mismatch. Methods: We used a structured, multi-phase design process to specify and configure a measurement-based care (MBC) strategy for bup-nx treatment (Bup-MBC) in outpatient addiction clinics through three phases: (1) a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for substance use treatment; (2) a qualitative needs assessment using the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior) model to identify gaps in risk monitoring, agency, and trust; and (3) iterative co-design with multidisciplinary clinicians to refine workflow fit and trust-preserving use of data. Patients informed item and feedback content during the needs assessment but did not participate in the co-design cycles. Results: Bup-MBC integrates (1) brief between-visit PROMs (e.g., withdrawal, craving, adherence); (2) immediate non-punitive patient feedback; (3) clinician-facing summaries and non-directive prompts in the electronic health record (EHR); and (4) an opt-in between-visit outreach pathway with predefined safety triggers, all configured within existing EHR and patient portal infrastructure. It targets patient and clinician capability to recognize changes in risk, opportunity for action through structured monitoring and visit preparation, and trust and agency through non-punitive communication, without adding substantial burden. The full measure set, severity bands, and question-to-action map are provided as supplementary material. Key trade-offs included prioritizing single-item measures for feasibility, balancing opt-in outreach with safety overrides, and assuming routine clinician use of summaries. Conclusion: This development study specifies an EHR-integrated MBC strategy for outpatient bup-nx treatment. As single-center design work with co-design limited to clinicians and delivery contingent on portal or text-message access, its outputs are hypotheses about mechanism and fit rather than demonstrated effects. Feasibility studies are needed to evaluate uptake, acceptability, workflow fit, and effects on treatment.

Background: Newly available arm angle data offers a new dimension to understand rising rates of arm injury in MLB pitchers. Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between arm angle, pitch characteristics, and elbow and forearm injury in MLB pitchers.<br><br> Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020 to 2025 and MLB injured list (IL) data were used to evaluate arm angle and pitch characteristics in relation to elbow and forearm injuries. Results are presented with and without requirements on prior season workload and for same-season and next-season injury incidence. A generalized additive model (GAM) was used to capture non-linear dependence and interactions between selected features and injury incidence to the elbow or forearm. Average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effect terms. Results: N = 3,812 pitcher-seasons were included. 29% pitchers who underwent UCLR did so in the same season as a forearm injury (tmean=44, tmedian=27 days to surgery). Arm angle, fastball usage, and their interaction were the three most predictive features. Arm angle was positively related to incidence of injury (ORmeanAME=1.014), fastball usage was inversely related to incidence of injury (ORmeanAME=0.243), and arm angle moderated the effect fastball usage at high arm angle, where increased usage was no longer protective. Slider velocity (ORmeanAME=1.072), spin rate (ORmeanAME=1.001), and usage (ORmeanAME=2.039) also significantly predicted injury risk. Fastball velocity was not significant in any fit, with ORmeanAME=0.999 across all fits. Fit-level Nagelkerke R2 values ranged from .019 to .052. Conclusion: Fastball usage and arm angle, not velocity, predicted elbow and forearm injury risk among MLB pitchers, and arm angle was the single most predictive feature. The heterogeneity of risk factors as a function of arm angle, and the novelty of MLB arm angle data, may explain why fastball usage has been previously underexplored as a risk factor. Keywords: baseball; arm angle; fastball velocity; fastball usage; spin rate; UCL; ulnar collateral ligament; elbow injury; forearm injury; Statcast

Disseminating study results to participants is an ethical responsibility for researchers but remains uncommon in low- and middle-income countries, and participants preferences for receiving study results are poorly understood. This study examined study result dissemination preferences among pregnant women in a phase III malaria prevention trial in Papua New Guinea (PNG). Participants completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire (survey) assessing their interest in and motivation for receiving trial results and preferences for dissemination methods and content. Associations between participants characteristics and dissemination preferences were explored using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Of 1172 trial participants, 96.0% (1125/1172) completed the survey, and of these 99.6% (1121/1125) wanted to learn about the trial results. The main motivation factors driving participants interest were an acknowledgment of their contribution to research (51.7%; n=579) and a better understanding of the study (45.0%; n=505). Most participants (78.9%; n=884) wanted to learn about the trial findings through written summary and a group meeting with other participants at the nearest clinic (31.1%, n=349). Multivariable regression analysis indicated that participants from rural/peri-urban clinics were more likely to choose non-electronic media dissemination approaches such as a group meeting as compared to urban-dwelling participants. Frequently selected items (>50% of participants) for content included information regarding good results of the study, purpose of the study, medical treatment advances, results specific to me, and how study was conducted. There was heterogenicity in the preference for dissemination content: compared to urban clinics rural clinics are less likely to want to learn about how and why study was conducted and medical and scientific advances. Overall, the majority wanted to learn about trial results, highlighting the importance of integrating dissemination into research activities in PNG. Variation in preferences for mode and content of dissemination between study clinics suggests that dissemination activities could be tailored to local context and preferences.

Background: Shiftwork disrupts natural sleep-wake cycles, alters light exposure patterns, and contributes to circadian misalignment. Detrimental health consequences associated with shift work include elevated risk for metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality. Healthcare workers have one of the highest rates of shift work exposure, yet there are relatively few non-pharmacological interventions (with good evidence) developed to improve sleep outcomes in this population. Objective: A pre-post pilot interventional study assessed the acceptability and perceived effectiveness of commercial noise-masking earbuds on improving subjective sleep characteristics among National Health Service (NHS) healthcare staff working fast rotating shifts. Methods: Noise-masking sleep earbuds (Kokoon NightBuds) were worn for a pilot six-week intervention by twenty-seven NHS nurses (aged 26-43 years, 88.9% female) working fast rotating shifts from the EClocker Study. Sensors inside the earbuds were paired with a smartphone app to monitor sleep. An audio library in the smartphone app delivered personalised relaxation exercises and sleep techniques drawn from cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). A pre-post two-week monitoring period with daily smartphone-based Experience Sampling Methods (ESM) captured perceived daily sleep patterns. Acceptability and perceived effectiveness of the earbuds in promoting better sleep outcomes was assessed. Results: Use of the noise-masking sleep earbuds over a six-week period was associated with positive sleep improvement trends and elicited promising acceptability. Almost two thirds of NHS fast rotating shift nurses (63%) subjectively reported reductions in general sleep disturbance symptoms (PSQI Global), one in four experienced perceived sleep quality improvements (SQ; 25.9%), one in five reported sleeping longer (TST; 22.2%), and a third perceived falling asleep faster (SOL; 33.3%), had better sleep efficiency (SE; 33.3%) and improved daytime dysfunction (33.3%) (PSQI subcomponent scores). Sleep diaries (CSD) collected daily using smartphone-based ESM also demonstrated small improvements post-sleep earbud use; nurses reported sleeping an average 18 minutes longer (TST) and fell asleep more easily, on average 11 minutes faster (SOL). Sleep earbuds were generally well tolerated; 56% of nurses reported the earbuds as (somewhat to very) helpful, 52% reported (somewhat to strongly) falling asleep more easily (SOL), 44% felt (somewhat to strongly) their sleep quality was improved (SQ) and 30% agreed (somewhat to strongly) they slept longer (TST) and had less disturbed sleep. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study in Europe to pilot noise-masking earbuds as a potential non-pharmacological aid to improve sleep-wake behaviours or mitigate fatigue for healthcare staff. Preliminary results showed promising acceptability and (small) perceived sleep improvement trends following a targeted six-week earbud intervention in NHS fast rotating shift nurses.

Purpose: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) reduces lung cancer mortality, yet screening participation remains low. We evaluated whether a brief informational video nudge delivered immediately before a scheduled clinical encounter increased LCS ordering and baseline LCS completion. Patients and Methods: We conducted a randomized feasibility trial within Kaiser Permanente Colorado from March through October 2025. LCS-eligible patients with an upcoming primary care or pulmonology appointment were assigned to intervention or usual care based on birth month. Intervention patients were split into two group, a group who received the LCS informational video nudge via text message within 24 hours of an eligible appointment; and second group who received the text plus a QR code video link during appointment rooming. Outcomes included LCS orders, baseline LCS-LDCT completion, and video engagement. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with LCS ordering. Results: Among 1,093 patients, 549 were assigned to intervention and 544 to usual care. Intervention patients were more likely to receive an LCS order within 1 day of their appointment (22.6% vs 16.4%; p=.010) and any time during follow-up (32.6% vs 24.1%; p=.002). Baseline LCS-LDCT completion was 51% higher in the intervention group, although the difference was not statistically significant (8.6% vs 5.7%; p=.078). Among the intervention group, 93 individuals (17%) viewed the video, generating 114 total views, and viewers watched an average of 79% of the video. Most views (82.5%) occurred through text-message delivery rather than QR codes. Conclusion: A brief, low-burden LCS informational video delivered immediately before a clinical encounter and integrated into existing workflows significantly increased LCS ordering and was associated with higher screening completion. Timely, scalable digital nudges may provide an effective strategy for improving LCS participation. Based on the observed effectiveness, feasibility, and efficiency of the intervention, KPCO incorporated the behavioral nudge into standard clinical care in February 2026.

Background: Sweeping sliders with large horizontal break are hypothesized to be associated with arm injury, and prior work suggests a link between slider usage, arm angle, and injury. Purpose: To evaluate whether arm angle and slider horizontal movement are associated with elbow or forearm injury risk in MLB pitchers. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3 Methods: Statcast data from 2020-2025 and injury data were used to study the relationship between sliders and arm injuries. Pitchers with at least 30 innings pitched (IP) were evaluated for same- and next-season injury incidence to the Elbow, Forearm, or Elbow/Forearm. A generalized additive model (GAM) related pitch-level variables to injury incidence, and average marginal effect (AME) odds ratios are reported for main effects. Results: All fits were significant at p<.01. Fits for same-season (N=1,957, p=.00008, R2=.066) and next-season (N=2,511, p=.00005, R2=.053) Elbow/Forearm injury were significant at p<.001. Same-season (R2=.061) and next-season (R2=.055) Forearm injury fits had p=.001. Main effects for slider glove-side movement and fastball usage, their interactions with arm angle, and arm angle main effects were the most predictive features. Across the three fits where the slider glove-side movement main effect was significant, odds ratios ranged from 1.03 to 1.07, meaning that each additional inch of slider glove-side movement was associated with a 3% to 7% increase in the observed injury incidence. Furthermore, this effect was magnified at high arm angle and muted at low arm angle. Conclusion: We observed that slider horizontal movement, arm angle, and their interaction were significantly associated with incidence of Forearm and combined Elbow/Forearm injury. This effect was weak or non-existent at low arm angles and strong at high arm angles, suggesting that arm angle moderates the risk of slider horizontal movement, and providing evidence that sliders with large horizontal break (e.g. sweepers) may pose an injury risk. Keywords: baseball; sweeper; slider; arm angle; horizontal movement; elbow injury; forearm injury

Background: Consumer use of AI chatbots for health advice is rising, yet triage safety relative to established services remains unclear. Australia's Healthdirect, a government-backed symptom checker with 2.4 million uses in FY2024-25, remains unevaluated against frontier large language models (LLMs), and whether premium subscriptions improve triage safety remains unexplored. This study compared the triage accuracy and safety of Healthdirect against six LLM configurations across ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, assessed whether paid subscriptions improve triage safety, and characterised each system's error patterns. Methods: Forty-five clinical vignettes from the Semigran et al. benchmark spanning emergency, non-emergent, and self-care categories (15 each) were evaluated across seven systems. Healthdirect was tested following a seven-rule interaction protocol. LLMs were evaluated using first-person patient-language prompts under free-tier and paid-tier conditions. Outcomes were triage accuracy, emergency sensitivity, under-triage, and critical misses, analysed using Cochran's Q, Bonferroni-corrected McNemar tests, Cohen's kappa, and Wilson intervals. Findings: Triage accuracy differed significantly (Cochran's Q = 36.79, p < 0.001). Healthdirect achieved 48.9% accuracy (95% CI 35.0% to 63.0%; kappa = 0.233) versus 73.3% to 86.7% for LLMs (kappa = 0.600 to 0.800). Healthdirect operated under conservative interactive defaults while LLMs received complete information in a single prompt, which may have disadvantaged Healthdirect. Emergency sensitivity was 46.7% versus 80.0% to 86.7% for LLMs. Healthdirect produced two critical misses; no LLM produced any across 270 evaluations (95% CI 0% to 1.4%). When LLMs undertriaged, they recommended GP care rather than self-care. No tier differences were significant (all p > 0.05), and most systems over-triaged self-care cases. Interpretation: Frontier LLMs demonstrated higher triage accuracy and safer error profiles than Healthdirect. All LLMs avoided critical misses; Healthdirect did not. Premium subscriptions did not significantly improve triage safety. These findings support clinical governance decisions about whether LLMs warrant formal evaluation alongside government-backed symptom checkers.

Introduction: Clinical students are a future health workforce, yet their roles during outbreaks of highly infectious diseases remain uncertain because of safety, training, supervision and welfare concerns. Ugandas 2022 outbreak of Ebola disease caused by Sudan ebolavirus highlighted the need to understand how clinical students perceive outbreak-related care. Aim: This study explored willingness to care for patients with Ebola virus disease among clinical students at a Ugandan medical school and examined how perceived risks, perceived benefits and support needs shaped that willingness. Methods: An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was conducted among clinical students of Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda. Fifteen undergraduate medical and nursing students in the later years of training were purposively selected. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, de-identified and analysed using latent content analysis. The Health Belief Model sensitised interpretation, and reporting was strengthened using the COREQ guidance. Results: Five interrelated themes emerged, showing that willingness to care was conditional rather than simply present or absent. Students described an initial willingness grounded in professional duty, devotion to patients and the desire to save life. This willingness was restrained by perceived risks of contracting Ebola virus disease, dying, transmitting infection to family members or colleagues, emotional distress, lack of epidemic-readiness in the curriculum, inadequate preparedness and weak welfare support. Perceived benefits, including patient survival, professional learning, outbreak experience and personal fulfilment, strengthened willingness but did not override safety concerns. Students identified reliable personal protective equipment, epidemic-ready curricula, practical infection-prevention and control training, simulation, clear protocols, close supervision, psychosocial support, insurance and fair compensation as cues to action that could convert willingness into safe participation. Conclusions: Clinical students in this Ugandan teaching hospital expressed a strong sense of professional responsibility, but their willingness to participate in Ebola care was conditional upon preparedness, protection, epidemic-ready education and institutional trust. Professional duty and learning opportunities promoted participation, whereas perceived risks and inadequate support limited it. Medical education programmes and outbreak-response systems should develop ethical, supervised, competency-based student roles supported by practical curricula, reliable protective equipment and psychosocial and welfare safeguards.

Aim: The Patient Safety Screener-3 (PSS-3) is a brief suicide-risk screening tool. Item 1 of this scale assesses depressive mood but is not included in the total score. We examined the association of item 1 with depressive symptom severity and characterized the suicide-related risk captured by PSS-3 total positivity. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey among resident physicians in Japan. Associations between PSS-3 item 1 endorsement and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores were evaluated using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Diagnostic performance of item 1 was evaluated using PHQ-9 positivity ([&ge;]10) as reference standard. We also compared Short-form Scale for Suicide Ideation (SIS-6) scores according to PSS-3 total positivity and PHQ-9 item 9 positivity. Results: A total of 1,844 participants were included. PSS-3 item 1 was endorsed by 443 physicians (24.0%), and 47 (2.5%) met the criteria for PSS-3 total positivity. Item 1 showed 79.3% sensitivity and 79.5% specificity for PHQ-9 positivity. SIS-6 scores were higher in the PSS-3 total-positive group than in the total-negative group (median [IQR], 6 [5-9] vs 0 [0-1]; p<0.001). The SIS-6 showed a higher area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Youden index using PSS-3 total positivity (AUC, 0.961; optimal cutoff, 3) than PHQ-9 item 9 positivity (AUC, 0.907; optimal cutoff, 2). Discussion: PSS-3 may support brief, simultaneous screening for depressive symptoms and suicide-related risk. Compared with PHQ-9 item 9, PSS-3 may capture a more severe spectrum of suicide-related risk. PSS-3 may facilitate identification of individuals requiring further mental health assessment.

The availability of hearing aids that can connect wirelessly to smartphone technologies via Bluetooth has grown exponentially in recent years. However, there is limited evidence assessing the benefits of user-adjustability afforded by these devices. This study aimed to assess the benefits of smartphone-connected hearing aids and an accompanying application (or app) in new and existing hearing aid users. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 44 adult hearing aid users (14 new and 30 existing) were recruited. Participants were fitted bilaterally with smartphone-connected hearing aids that could be adjusted by the user via an app. Self-reported outcome measures were collected at fitting and after seven-weeks of using the device in everyday life. For both new and existing hearing aid users, significant improvements in social participation, hearing-related fatigue, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction were found. For existing hearing aid users, all outcomes were significantly better for the smartphone-connected hearing aids plus app in comparison to their existing hearing aids that did not connect to a smartphone, all with moderate-to-large clinical effect sizes (d> .6). User-controllability via the app was identified as the key benefit, and most participants (68%) reported that the app met their needs 'extremely' or 'very well'. These results suggest that, when used in conjunction with an app, smartphone-connected hearing aids can improve hearing outcomes due to greater user-controllability to improve listening. Thus, smartphone-connected hearing aids have the potential to facilitate patient-centred care, empowering the individual to successfully manage their hearing loss.

Background Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness (BPCR) education is an important component of antenatal care. However, health education materials translated from one language into another may lose their intended meaning if linguistic, cultural, experiential, and sociolinguistic differences are not considered. In Tanzania, maternal health education is commonly delivered in Swahili, while many source materials are developed in English. This study explored the cultural and linguistic equivalence of BPCR terminology and concepts in a translated Swahili BPCR education manual among Hehe pregnant women in the rural Iringa Region, Tanzania. Methods A descriptive qualitative study was conducted in seven villages across Kilolo and Mufindi districts of Iringa Region. Seven focus group discussions (FGDs) involving 56 pregnant women were conducted. Participants were purposively selected from the Hehe community and were asked to interpret terminology and concepts contained in a harmonized Swahili BPCR education manual. The translation and adaptation process comprised six sequential steps: forward translation, synthesis, back translation, expert review, community exploration, and finalization. FGDs were conducted in Swahili by trained facilitators fluent in both Swahili and Hehe, audio-recorded with consent, transcribed, and thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarkes six-phase approach. Analysis focused on semantic, conceptual, experiential, and sociolinguistic equivalence. Reporting was informed by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ). Results Five themes were developed: (1) culturally and linguistically familiar expressions conveyed BPCR concepts; (2) experiential and contextual language shaped descriptions of danger signs; (3) sociolinguistic norms and modesty influenced communication about sensitive health topics; (4) some clinically important concepts had partial or limited conceptual equivalence; and (5) unfamiliar concepts required supplementary explanation. Participants identified culturally familiar expressions including "matazamio ya kujifungua" ("anticipated date of delivery"), "fedha ndiyo usafiri" ("money itself is transport"), "chupa imepasuka" ("the water bag has burst"), "mtoto kutokucheza tumboni" ("the baby is not moving in the womb"), and "sehemu za siri" ("private parts"). Some expressions were familiar but broader than their biomedical equivalents, while cord prolapse and neonatal cyanosis had no readily recognized community equivalents. Conclusion The findings indicate that cultural and linguistic equivalence cannot be achieved through literal translation alone. Community exploration identified expressions that were familiar and socially acceptable while also revealing clinical concepts requiring additional explanation. The findings informed refinement of the Swahili BPCR education manual while preserving the intended clinical meaning. The adapted terminology should subsequently be evaluated separately for its effects on knowledge, attitudes, practices, and other health outcomes.